Complete documentation of what the defense will argue about prior pathology — built by someone who has applied that same argument from the payer side across 3,000+ claim reviews.
Every prior condition, injury, treatment, and surgery in the record — organized chronologically with clinical significance noted.
For each prior condition: what the defense is likely to argue, how strong that argument is, and what documentation supports or undermines it.
Whether the documented clinical picture is consistent with aggravation, a new injury on a predisposed structure, or a new injury entirely.
How much weight the pre-existing conditions are likely to carry in a defense medical review — rated by pressure intensity.
Cases involving spine surgery where the client has pre-existing degenerative disc disease — the most contested medical issue in high-value PI litigation.
Cases where imaging shows degeneration that predates the accident — the defense will argue the accident did not cause the pathology the treatment addressed.
Older clients with constitutional degeneration — documentation must distinguish accident-related pathology from age-related baseline.
Cases with prior injuries at the same anatomical level — requires precise documentation differentiation.
Defense & carrier apportionment: Physician-authored documentation of what pre-existing conditions contribute to the claimed damages, calibrated for reserve-setting and apportionment arguments. Invoiced on Net 15 terms.
Demonstrated as Component 04 in the Full Intelligence Report specimen. Prior pathology analysis with defense weighting assessment.
Built from first-hand application of payer attribution methodology.